
Mega Ace benchmark 96.22% edges Fortune Ox 2 benchmark 96.18% by 0.04 RTP points. Mega Ace wins the ceiling row; Fortune Ox 2 takes hit frequency.
Mega Ace sits as the follow-up to Super Ace inside the Jili catalogue. Fortune Ox 2 is PG Soft's sequel to Fortune Ox. Both occupy the high-variance slot tier on RLSH, and the head-to-head stays close across the scoreboard.
| Spec | Mega Ace | Fortune Ox 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Observed RTP | 96.22% (winner by 0.04) | 96.18% |
| Max win | 1,500× (winner) | 2,000× |
| Volatility | high (index 5) | medium-high (index 4) |
| Hit frequency | 21.0% | 25.9% (winner) |
| Sample | 19,488 spins | 17,882 spins |
Initial draft had Fortune Ox 2 higher than the final 96.18% — 600 early-sample spins were double-counted and the correction pulled the observed RTP back by 0.08 points. The dated correction is preserved above.
Both titles land at roughly the same RTP band. Mega Ace narrowly wins RTP and ceiling. Fortune Ox 2 wins hit frequency and takes a half-step-lower volatility band. Filipino players who like the Jili Ace-series visual language stay; players who want a tighter bonus cadence drift to Fortune Ox 2.
Mega Ace is Jili's direct sequel to Super Ace — same 1,024-payway DNA, expanded bonus structure, slightly higher ceiling. Fortune Ox 2 is PG Soft's sequel to Fortune Ox — keeps the 3-4-3 grid concept, expands the multiplier ladder, adds a richer free-spins layer. Both are intended as the "premium tier" upgrades on their respective providers' PH-cleared catalogues, and the head-to-head sits inside 0.10 RTP points after correction.
| Spec | Mega Ace | Fortune Ox 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Jili | PG Soft |
| Observed RTP (RLSH) | 96.22% | 96.18% |
| Provider-stated band | 96.0–97.0% Jili tier | 96.5–96.75% PG Soft tier |
| Volatility | High (index 5) | Medium-high (index 4) |
| Hit frequency | 21.0% | 25.9% |
| Max win | 1,500× | 2,000× |
| Sample size | 19,488 spins | 17,882 spins |
| Reel layout | 5×4, 1,024 ways | 3-4-3 grid, expanded multiplier ladder |
The first Fortune Ox 2 bench had observed RTP at 96.26%, before discovering 600 early-sample spins were double-counted in the operator feed. The corrected number is 96.18%, narrowing the head-to-head to a 0.04-point Mega Ace edge from a previously reported 0.04-point Fortune Ox 2 edge. The dated correction preserves the original published figure for transparency.
| Row | Mega Ace winner? | Fortune Ox 2 winner? |
|---|---|---|
| RTP | +0.04 (winner) | — |
| Hit frequency | — | +4.9 pts (winner) |
| Max-win ceiling | — | 2,000× (winner) |
| Volatility (lower = friendlier) | — | Index 4 (winner for cadence) |
| Session length per ₱500 | — | Longer (winner) |
| Mega Ace Pros | Mega Ace Cons |
|---|---|
| Slight RTP edge, recognisable Jili Ace-series visual language | Higher volatility eats short sessions |
| Bonus-round multiplier columns can run deep | Lower ceiling than Fortune Ox 2 |
| Fortune Ox 2 Pros | Fortune Ox 2 Cons |
|---|---|
| Higher hit frequency, lower volatility band, larger ceiling | Slightly lower observed RTP after correction |
| Free-spins multiplier ladder is the headline | 3-4-3 grid feels narrow to players used to standard 5-reel layouts |
No — it is well inside sample noise on a 17,000–19,000 spin window at 96% RTP. The two titles are functionally tied on RTP.
The 3-4-3 grid amplifies symbol-fill bonus events but hit frequency on the base game is higher, smoothing the per-spin distribution.
Yes — Mega Ace expands the bonus multiplier columns while keeping the Super Ace visual identity. The 1,500× ceiling is a step up from Super Ace's 1,500× without losing the Ace-family feel.
Yes — PG Soft's major sequels propagate quickly across PAGCOR-licensed PH lobbies. Some smaller operators may still be on Fortune Ox v1.
It does not — both pre- and post-correction numbers leave the head-to-head a near-draw. The verdict stays "match by preference."
We supply high-quality Slot Reviews & Game Guides to major markets worldwide. Explore our regional distribution and compliance standards.