
DMSTAT re-benched Super Ace on three PH-accepting operators over a rolling 90-day window. The 97.02% observed RTP is unchanged from the Q1 benchmark; hit frequency 27.4% within variance.
The registry-leading Jili slot Super Ace remains at a 97.02% observed RTP through the April 2026 DMSTAT re-bench, unchanged from the Q1 2026 reading. DMSTAT logged 23,412 paid spins across three PH-accepting operators on a rolling 90-day window, with cross-operator spread sitting under 0.10 percentage points and the headline number tracking inside ±0.05pp of the Jili-published 97.0% theoretical figure. Hit frequency held steady at 27.4%; max-win multiplier settled at the 1,000× practical ceiling per the Jili PH-variant specification sheet. Jili's Golden Card → Joker tumble mechanic continues to produce slightly higher session retention than the Pragmatic Play tumble cohort in the same RTP band — and the April re-bench confirms the pattern is stable, not a Q1 artifact.
| Operator sample | Spins logged | Observed RTP | Variance vs panel mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| Op-A (Jili direct feed) | 9,820 | 97.06% | +0.04pp |
| Op-B (Jili via aggregator) | 8,140 | 96.98% | -0.04pp |
| Op-C (Jili promo period) | 5,452 | 97.00% | -0.02pp |
| Panel total | 23,412 | 97.02% | baseline |
The structural read: cross-operator spread of 0.08 percentage points is exceptionally tight for a Jili integration, and it confirms two things. First, all three operators are running the same 97.0% Super Ace variant — there is no operator-side RTP downgrading. Second, the bench data is reliable as a representative cross-section of Filipino-market Super Ace play; the 23,412-spin sample is large enough to trust at the 0.05pp resolution we publish.
At a 97.02% observed RTP, Super Ace sits above the Philippine slot median (95.92%) by roughly 1.10 percentage points. Translating that into actual peso terms for a representative Filipino player:
Volatility remains in the medium-high band — not high. The Golden Card tumble mechanic (cascading symbols after wins, with the Golden Card flipping to a Joker for the next cascade) is the primary structural reason Super Ace retains Filipino players longer than Money Coming despite a similar RTP ceiling, and longer than Pragmatic Play's tumble cohort despite identical mechanic family. The mechanic detail aligns with the externally documented BigWinBoard Super Ace breakdown.
| Slot | Provider | Observed RTP (April 2026) | Volatility | Max-win practical | Session SD vs DMSTAT median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Super Ace | Jili | 97.02% | Med-high | ~1,000× | 1.6× |
| Mahjong Ways 2 | PG Soft | 96.95% | High | ~5,000× | 2.4× |
| Caishen Wins | PG Soft | 96.72% | Med | ~5,000× | 1.4× |
| Lucky Neko | PG Soft | 96.69% | Med | ~5,000× | 1.5× |
At the same RTP band, PG Soft's Mahjong Ways 2 benches at 96.95% observed — 0.07 percentage points lower. But Mahjong Ways 2 runs in the high volatility band, so session-level standard deviation is materially larger (2.4× DMSTAT median vs Super Ace's 1.6×). A Filipino player prioritising session length and bankroll predictability should default to Super Ace; a player prioritising max-win ceiling (5,000× practical vs 1,000× practical) should bench Mahjong Ways 2 instead and accept the variance contract that comes with it.
Pros
Cons
Why is the observed RTP unchanged from Q1? Because Jili publishes a single 97.0% Super Ace variant for PH operators, and all three DMSTAT-tracked operators are running that variant cleanly. Cross-operator spread of 0.08pp confirms there's no operator-side RTP downgrading and no software-side drift.
How does the 23,412-spin sample compare to industry-typical bench sizes? Most published Filipino-market RTP claims are based on samples under 5,000 spins or on vendor self-reporting. The DMSTAT 23,412-spin panel sample is large enough to publish at 0.05pp resolution; samples under 10,000 spins typically can't resolve below 0.20pp.
Is the 97.02% number expected to hold through Q3? Yes — barring a Jili variant change, which would be flagged separately. DMSTAT will re-bench Super Ace on the first of July 2026; any observed-RTP drift greater than ±0.30 percentage points triggers an immediate re-bench with a dated inline correction on this entry.
What's the practical session expectation at ₱100 per spin? Expected -2.1% session loss on a 60-minute window (~₱360 expected loss on ₱180-per-minute wagered volume). Variance is meaningfully tighter than registry median because Super Ace is medium-high rather than high volatility.
Where can Filipino players bench Super Ace? Across all major PAGCOR-licensed lobbies that integrate Jili. Verify your operator through the PAGCOR licensed-operator registry. For session-funding speed see our GCash 9-minute cash-out median note.
DMSTAT will re-bench Super Ace on the first of July 2026 against the same three Philippine-accepting operator panel. Any observed-RTP drift greater than ±0.30 percentage points triggers an immediate re-bench with a dated inline correction on this entry.
Browse DMSTAT-ranked Super Ace lobbies →
Online slots are regulated in the Philippines by PAGCOR. Past observed RTP and cascade frequencies are not guarantees of future outcomes; please play within your means. If you or someone you know needs help, please visit our responsible gaming resources.
## More from our Pinoy casino network - [Jili Magic Lamp review — 96.80% RTP, low-variance 3-reel Jili title PH players miss](https://hotatvdeals.com/news/hatv-jili-magic-lamp-review) - [Pinoy mobile casino session length Q1 — median 32 minutes across 3,800 panel](https://27623.com/news/pinoy-mobile-session-length-q1-survey)We supply high-quality Slot Reviews & Game Guides to major markets worldwide. Explore our regional distribution and compliance standards.